Overview and Hiring Practices
An Overview of the Bureaus Within the Society
Each
of the five bureaus at the Legal Aid Society of Nassau County assumes a
separate part of the Society's responsibilities. Which bureau you join will depend
on your own special interests and skills. Attorneys who want to try criminal
cases before a jury begin in the District Court Bureau
handling misdemeanors. Within three years those attorneys may be asked to stay
on as a member of the County Court Bureau, representing
clients charged with felonies. Defending against criminal charges is the
largest part of the Society's responsibility, and attorneys in this field need
to be expert not only in the law and in trial procedure, but also in
approaching defendants who are often frightened or suspicious.
Work
in the Family Court Bureau frequently tests an attorney's
ability to use negotiation and mediation, as well as more traditional legal
skills, to protect a client's interests. Issues in the Family Court can be
emotional; the clients of this bureau have usually become involved with the law
because they are part of a family in crisis. Attorneys handling the clients'
legal problems must also address their social concerns.
Attorneys
in the Appeals Bureau need excellent writing skills and strong
academic backgrounds. Some people say appeals work requires a "lawyer's
lawyer"--someone who can do everything from identifying and researching
issues to arguing convincingly before a panel of appellate judges.
District Court Bureau
The
District Court Bureau is the largest bureau at the Legal Aid Society, handling
the highest volume of cases in this office. This bureau is responsible for
representing all defendants charged with misdemeanors and violations from the
inception of a case until ultimate disposition through plea bargaining, trial
or dismissals after motions. Attorneys in this bureau also represent
individuals charged with pre-indictment felonies and handle parole revocation
defense. At revocation hearings, attorneys present witnesses, conduct cross
examination, and make opening and closing statements before an administrative
law judge.
All of the District Court attorneys are personally responsible for their
caseloads, yet there is a constant exchange of ideas between all member of the
staff. Inexperienced attorneys receive personal supervision on their cases with
the supervisors acting as co-counsel during their first trials. This guarantees
individualized training for the attorney and at the same time assures proper
representation.
The District Court Bureau has all of the advantages of a small office with
constant cooperation among the attorneys, and it avoids the impersonal aspects
associated with larger offices in private law firms. We are also fortunate in
having sufficient support personnel to assist the attorneys. The daily practice
is indeed bustling. No one gets bored, the days fly by and we end each day with
the comforting feeling that we are doing something that really matters to our
clients. The camaraderie among the attorneys in the bureau makes working here a
unique experience. Most attorneys who have worked here and then embarked on
another career look back at their experience in District Court and feel it was
the best job they have ever had.
The District Court staff is presently divided into several units. When a
defendant is arrested his first appearance in court is in the Arraignment Court
where the client is advised of the nature of the charge(s) pending against him
and a bail application is made. Our arraignment unit is comprised of several
attorneys and a unit supervisor. Their work day starts early when they
interview recent arrestees in the detention cells obtaining background
information pertinent to bail applications. If appropriate, the attorneys
telephone individuals related to the defendant or otherwise involved in the
case in order to shed further light on what would be appropriate bail.
Telephone contact is particularly valuable in spousal abuse cases or cases
involving assaultive conduct. In those instances speaking to the complainant
can be influential in opposing the prosecutor's applications for Orders of
Protections against our client. The considerable effort expended by these
attorneys puts them in an excellent position to make meritorious applications
to the court.
The pre-indictment felonies are assigned to the District Court Bureau's
Felony Examination Unit (also called Part 9). The attorneys assigned to that
unit are the more experienced District Court attorneys. As these attorneys represent
defendants charged with more serious offenses, they are closely supervised by
the County Court Bureau Chief and the Deputy District Court Bureau Chief. The
Felony Examination Unit carefully reviews each case after conducting an
extensive interview with each client. This analysis prepares them to engage in
meaningful case analysis and plea negotiations.
The last unit of the District Court Bureau is the core unit which is
responsible for misdemeanor and violation case preparation and plea
negotiation, motion practice, and pre-trial and trial litigation. Their
practice is quite demanding as they are responsible for heavy caseloads handled
in the hectic environment of the District Court. Nassau County treats those
charged with misdemeanors quite harshly; consequently our plea bargaining is
quite challenging and our trial practice is extensive.
Most of the attorneys assigned to the District Court Bureau are
inexperienced. To ensure quality representation for our clients, these
attorneys undergo rigorous training and supervision, consisting of formal
lectures, videotapes, simulations and a wealth of written materials. They
receive additional "on-the-job" training in all aspects of their
work. In court the junior attorneys are supervised by the more experienced
attorneys. When the attorneys conduct their first two pre-trial hearings and
their first two trials they are "second seated" by the Bureau Chief
or the Deputy Bureau Chief. This litigation is followed by comprehensive
written evaluations of their performance which are reviewed with the Bureau
Chief. It is our aim to provide invaluable training for our attorneys while at
the same time guaranteeing that clients receive competent representation. The
District Court Bureau provides a wonderful opportunity for attorneys to gain
insight and meaningful experience in criminal law, coupled with invaluable
litigation experience that prepares them to be competent in any legal endeavor
requiring litigation and negotiation skills.
A great deal of time has been devoted this past year to assisting in the
development and operation of specialized courts in the District Court.
Throughout the year the Legal Aid Society handled the majority of cases that
were referred to the Community Court. This court is designed to deal with
'quality of life crimes,' charges that effect the daily activity of the
community, such as littering, graffiti, minor larcenies, prostitution, criminal
mischief, etc. The theory behind this court is that defendants charged with
less serious offenses should be given the opportunity to avoid criminal
convictions by agreeing to receive needed treatment for alcohol or drug
dependance, educational programs and performing community service. The
dispositions in the Community Court are supposed to occur quickly in order to
address defendants' problems as well as showing the community that a reasonable
punishment has been imposed. The services provided by the community service are
designed to show the community that people arrested for these type of
violations will be swiftly punished and that the punishment will actually help
the neighborhood.
The District Court Bureau has also been instrumental in creating two
additional specialized courts, the Domestic Violence Court and the Drug Court.
Both of these courts will only handle cases that meet strict requirements. In
the Drug Court, defendants charged with specified crimes and who would be
expected to receive more than a 90-day sentence if convicted of the crime
charged are screened to determine their need for drug or alcohol therapy,
educational training to receive a GED, and possible vocational training. Once a
client's needs are assessed, the defendant, prosecutor and court enter into a
contract spelling out defendant's responsibilities as well as a commitment from
the judge and prosecutor as to the disposition and sentence that will be
imposed if defendant successfully completes his obligations. It is anticipated
that in the majority of cases, upon defendant's successful performance, the
pending charge(s) will be dismissed.
The last newly formed court is the Domestic Violence court that presides
over misdemeanor cases involving criminal acts of violence between spouses or
individuals that have a child in common and who are living together. These
cases will be screened at arraignments by the prosecutor and forwarded to the
Domestic Violence Court. This court is presided over by a County Court Judge
who has been empowered with the jurisdiction of a District Court Judge and a
Family Court Judge. The aim of this court is to improve victim safety and
support, while at the same time rehabilitating defendants with a violent
propensity. The court is creating a multi-disciplinary response to the domestic
violence problem, through partnerships with domestic violence advocates, service
providers and other criminal justice agencies.
The District Court Bureau is responsible for coordinating the Continuing
Legal Education program for the Legal aid Society. As an MCLE Accredited
Provider this office conducts in-house training for its attorneys. The programs
are designed to improve the attorneys' legal skills while at the same time
ensuring that they will accumulate the required Mandatory Continuing Legal
Education credits.
Family Court Bureau
Attorneys
in the Family Court Bureau represent clients in matters involving child neglect
and abuse, custody and visitation rights, family protection orders, termination
of parental rights, and the defense of respondents in paternity cases and
violations of support orders. The Nassau County Department of Social Services
is the petitioner in child protective cases and in those paternity and support
cases where the child is a recipient of public assistance.
A new attorney in the Bureau begins with support, paternity and family
offense cases. The Bureau Chief reviews the case with the new attorney and
advises what questions to raise. New attorneys spend some time observing other
members of the Bureau in the Family Court before handling their own assigned
cases.
The Legal Aid attorney works hard to make the client--who may have begun to
see all professional people as adversaries--feel that the Society, at least, is
on his side. "These are people under great stress," says the Family
Court Bureau Chief. "The issues are human, psychological. Of course, cases
like these can be very tiring and frustrating. But they are rewarding
too."
Experienced attorneys in the Bureau take on the more difficult cases--those
involving custody and neglect, for example, where there is more law to know and
a greater probability of unexpected events.
Sometimes a Family Court case may spill over into the other bureaus as well.
In one incident that occurred some years ago, three bureaus--Family Court,
District Court and Appeals--all represented one client who had first been
charged with neglect because of her son's truancy, was then charged with
assault when she resisted a sheriff who tried to arrest her on a warrant, and
was then ordered by the Family Court judge to have a test for AIDS, although
there was no evidence of her being at risk for AIDS and no connection between
AIDS and the allegations in the neglect petition. A stay of the test was
granted after the Appeals Bureau was given permission to represent the woman on
appeal of the judge's order. The Appellate Division subsequently sustained the
Society's position.
"These kinds of cases offer an attorney, even someone who is not
interested in a family or divorce practice, the broadest kind of
experience," says the Family Court Bureau Chief. "They can help a
young attorney build an extraordinarily interesting resume."
Appeals Bureau
New
attorneys in the Appeals Bureau can expect to file their first briefs in
appeals of misdemeanor cases within a few months of their arrival at the
Society. From the first day on the job, they work with the Bureau Chief to
review newly assigned cases. With his guidance, they formulate the appropriate
issues, brainstorm arguments, and do the research. Within six months, they may
have their first cases on the calendar before the Appellate Term of the Supreme
Court. As attorneys become more experienced, they handle felony appeals to the
Appellate Division in Brooklyn, federal Habeas Corpus petitions in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and petitions for
certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Typically, an attorney will have
a leave application granted to argue his or her first case before the Court of
Appeals in Albany in as little as two years.
The
bureau has achieved reversal or modification in an extraordinary number of its
cases; at the Appellate Term, our bureau's success rate has remained at or
above an impressive 50% as compared to the much lower rate among all criminal
cases argued before that court. Our efforts have also been particularly
outstanding before New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, and in one
recent year, every appeals attorney on staff argued at least one case before
that court--something many private attorneys do not have the opportunity to do
in an entire career.
There
is a certain luxury about doing appeals," the Bureau Chief says. "Our
attorneys can be fully prepared and can research every relevant precedent. When
we appear before an appellate panel, we are able to present our interpretation
of the law the way we think it should be understood and applied. Of course, the
court may not agree. But at least we get to set out a full, coherent and
professional argument."
The
Appeals Bureau has handled many cases over the last 25 years that have set
important New York State precedents. Among several notable examples, People
v. Rogers (48 N.Y.2d 167) significantly expanded the right to counsel in
New York. That judgment was reaffirmed and strengthened in People v.
Samuels (49 N.Y.2d 218), and then limited in People v. Bing (76
N.Y.2d 331), argued by our office. In 1999, our office successfully argued People
v. Hernandez (93 N.Y.2d 261), which established the right of defendants to
appeal their certification as a "sex offender," thereby prompting the
state Legislature to subsequently amend the Sex Offender Registration Act so as
to provide for civil review in such cases. As a result, the bureau now handles
these civil appeals as well. As recently as 2000 and 2001, this office has
continued to maintain a strong presence in the Court of Appeals with cases
having a significant impact on criminal law in areas as diverse as the form and
content of accusatory instruments (People v. Casey, 95 N.Y.2d 354) and
"lesser-included" offenses within the state Penal Law (People v.
Bartkow, 96 N.Y.2d 770).
In the
past, the Appeals Bureau has also handled litigation in support of prisoners'
rights at the Nassau County Correctional Center. In light of the United States
Department of Justice's 2000 report on the recent endemic abuse of inmates at
the county jail, prisoners' rights may once again become an important part of
what we do in the future.
Office-Wide Hiring Practices
All
attorneys hired to work for the Legal Aid Society are required to make a
three-year commitment to remain at the Society. Newly hired attorneys remain
probationary for a three year period.
At the completion of the three-year probationary period, a decision
based upon both the attorney's performance and the current staffing needs of
the office is made as to whether the attorney will be asked to stay on as a
tenured member of the staff. In the case of a District Court attorney, this
will only be done if there is a current or pending opening in the County Court
Bureau, the bureau that handles trial-level representation in felony cases at
the Legal Aid Society. Attorneys are not hired directly into this bureau, but
rather, are promoted from among the existing District Court Bureau staff.